-
Pronunciation: gu(a)-dalu-pe, guad(a)-lupe
-
Share your thoughts about Guadalupe
Infographic of Guadalupe name meaning, which is
Ask your friends & family about Guadalupe…
Guadalupe Name Popularity
How popular is the name Guadalupe? Here’s everything we know.
| Year |
Rank |
# Births |
% Births |
| 1910 |
— |
35 |
0.0099% |
| 1911 |
— |
23 |
0.0062% |
| 1912 |
— |
50 |
0.0099% |
| 1913 |
— |
61 |
0.0108% |
| 1914 |
— |
82 |
0.0118% |
| 1915 |
— |
88 |
0.0097% |
| 1916 |
— |
96 |
0.0099% |
| 1917 |
— |
78 |
0.0078% |
| 1918 |
— |
90 |
0.0084% |
| 1919 |
— |
142 |
0.0136% |
| 1920 |
— |
161 |
0.0145% |
| 1921 |
— |
167 |
0.0146% |
| 1922 |
— |
214 |
0.0192% |
| 1923 |
— |
185 |
0.0165% |
| 1924 |
— |
188 |
0.0162% |
| 1925 |
— |
204 |
0.018% |
| 1926 |
— |
204 |
0.0185% |
| 1927 |
— |
222 |
0.0201% |
| 1928 |
— |
218 |
0.0204% |
| 1929 |
— |
240 |
0.0232% |
| 1930 |
— |
228 |
0.0218% |
| 1931 |
— |
302 |
0.0306% |
| 1932 |
— |
221 |
0.0224% |
| 1933 |
— |
150 |
0.0161% |
| 1934 |
— |
194 |
0.0201% |
| 1935 |
— |
201 |
0.0207% |
| 1936 |
— |
155 |
0.0161% |
| 1937 |
— |
173 |
0.0176% |
| 1938 |
— |
199 |
0.0194% |
| 1939 |
— |
173 |
0.017% |
| 1940 |
— |
184 |
0.0173% |
| 1941 |
— |
183 |
0.0163% |
| 1942 |
— |
180 |
0.0143% |
| 1943 |
— |
270 |
0.0207% |
| 1944 |
— |
319 |
0.0257% |
| 1945 |
— |
305 |
0.025% |
| 1946 |
— |
360 |
0.0244% |
| 1947 |
— |
345 |
0.0207% |
| 1948 |
— |
372 |
0.0233% |
| 1949 |
— |
352 |
0.0219% |
| 1950 |
— |
342 |
0.0212% |
| 1951 |
— |
320 |
0.0189% |
| 1952 |
— |
321 |
0.0184% |
| 1953 |
— |
372 |
0.021% |
| 1954 |
— |
322 |
0.0176% |
| 1955 |
— |
290 |
0.0158% |
| 1956 |
— |
271 |
0.0143% |
| 1957 |
— |
241 |
0.0125% |
| 1958 |
— |
280 |
0.0148% |
| 1959 |
— |
230 |
0.0121% |
| 1960 |
— |
216 |
0.0114% |
| 1961 |
— |
234 |
0.0124% |
| 1962 |
— |
208 |
0.0113% |
| 1963 |
— |
200 |
0.0111% |
| 1964 |
— |
228 |
0.013% |
| 1965 |
— |
225 |
0.0138% |
| 1966 |
— |
199 |
0.0127% |
| 1967 |
— |
222 |
0.0146% |
| 1968 |
— |
221 |
0.0147% |
| 1969 |
— |
242 |
0.0157% |
| 1970 |
— |
218 |
0.0137% |
| 1971 |
— |
249 |
0.0166% |
| 1972 |
— |
229 |
0.0168% |
| 1973 |
— |
222 |
0.0171% |
| 1974 |
— |
283 |
0.0218% |
| 1975 |
— |
311 |
0.0242% |
| 1976 |
— |
284 |
0.022% |
| 1977 |
— |
274 |
0.0203% |
| 1978 |
— |
269 |
0.02% |
| 1979 |
— |
288 |
0.0204% |
| 1980 |
— |
285 |
0.0195% |
| 1981 |
— |
276 |
0.0188% |
| 1982 |
— |
258 |
0.0173% |
| 1983 |
— |
243 |
0.0165% |
| 1984 |
— |
228 |
0.0153% |
| 1985 |
— |
213 |
0.014% |
| 1986 |
— |
253 |
0.0168% |
| 1987 |
— |
213 |
0.014% |
| 1988 |
— |
197 |
0.0126% |
| 1989 |
— |
227 |
0.0141% |
| 1990 |
— |
234 |
0.0141% |
| 1991 |
— |
239 |
0.0147% |
| 1992 |
— |
210 |
0.0132% |
| 1993 |
— |
280 |
0.018% |
| 1994 |
— |
243 |
0.0158% |
| 1995 |
— |
223 |
0.0148% |
| 1996 |
— |
224 |
0.015% |
| 1997 |
— |
216 |
0.0146% |
| 1998 |
— |
193 |
0.0129% |
| 1999 |
— |
198 |
0.0132% |
| 2000 |
— |
200 |
0.0131% |
| 2001 |
— |
197 |
0.0131% |
| 2002 |
— |
174 |
0.0116% |
| 2003 |
— |
194 |
0.0128% |
| 2004 |
— |
154 |
0.0101% |
| 2005 |
— |
136 |
0.0089% |
| 2006 |
— |
161 |
0.0103% |
| 2007 |
— |
136 |
0.0086% |
| 2008 |
— |
149 |
0.0096% |
| 2009 |
— |
118 |
0.0079% |
| 2010 |
— |
91 |
0.0063% |
| 2011 |
— |
54 |
0.0038% |
| 2012 |
— |
86 |
0.006% |
| 2013 |
— |
48 |
0.0034% |
| 2014 |
— |
49 |
0.0034% |
| 2015 |
— |
35 |
0.0024% |
| 2016 |
— |
39 |
0.0027% |
| 2017 |
— |
32 |
0.0023% |
| 2018 |
— |
41 |
0.003% |
| 2019 |
— |
29 |
0.0021% |
| 2020 |
— |
15 |
0.0012% |
| 2021 |
— |
20 |
0.0016% |
| 2022 |
— |
25 |
0.0019% |
| 2023 |
— |
12 |
0.0009% |
Data via SSA.gov.